Wall Street Journal: “Russia’s inability to break through the stalemate in Ukraine is becoming so evident that significant voices in the Russian establishment have publicly started to call for an end to the conflict.”
“The big question is whether President Vladimir Putin will acknowledge this reality and abandon his aspiration to extinguish Ukrainian independence.”
___________
Russian elites are losing faith in the war with Ukraine—and in the system that started it. Their disillusionment is not loud, but it is deep, and it shows up in small signals that, together, look like a dangerous trend.
And no, Russia’s elite aren’t necessarily turning into moralists or anti-war liberals. A significant share still support the original goals of dominating Ukraine and resisting the West; what has changed is their belief that the current war can achieve those goals at an acceptable cost. Analysts describe an “elite deadlock”: they are tired of the war and privately critical, but too dependent on Putin’s system and too afraid of punishment to openly challenge him en masse.
Many would accept a “frozen conflict” or negotiated pause that lets them normalize business, reduce sanctions pressure, and stabilize the budget, even if it falls short of Putin’s original objectives.
Leadership tactics
At the same time, the way the war is being fought reinforces this disillusionment. The leadership has normalized tactics that throw away soldiers’ lives in small, expendable assault groups, trading blood for minor gains. That reflects a grim prediction at the top, suggesting that Russia can spend manpower almost without limit instead of rethinking strategy.
This practice fits a longer trend in Russian history, as Moscow is willing to tolerate extreme losses rather than admit a mistake or change course. For many insiders, the evidence confirms that the war is more of a dead end than a path to real victory.
Western and Ukrainian estimates suggest Russian forces have suffered hundreds of thousands of casualties, with some recent Western intelligence putting Russian deaths alone in the high hundreds of thousands since 2022.
Distancing from Putin
State-linked polling shows President Vladimir Putin’s approval slipping from previous prewar highs, suggesting that patriotic mobilization is losing its edge as economic pain and war fatigue deepen. And the old “social contract”—stay out of politics and enjoy private comfort—has broken down, replaced by a climate of intrusion, surveillance, and sacrifice with no compelling vision of the future. As a result, inside the ruling circles, elites and government officials have started talking about the war as something “he” is doing, not “we” are doing. That linguistic shift is a striking trend: it shows elites mentally distancing themselves from President Vladimir Putin’s decisions. However, Putin still wields tremendous power. So, as long as attempts to defect or organize opposition are more dangerous than grumbling from within, most elite insiders will bite their tongues and tolerate a failing strategy rather than risk their lives and fortunes.
Predictable trends and emerging risks
Taken together, current trends predict a Russia where the war continues but enthusiasm for it steadily drains away among both elites and the broader public. Instead of unifying the country, the conflict increasingly looks like a grinding liability that magnifies economic decay and international isolation.
The more the Kremlin leans on repression, asset seizures, and censorship to manage this discontent, the more brittle the system becomes. Experts warn that over time this brittleness can turn today’s quiet souring into tomorrow’s acute crisis, especially if battlefield setbacks or economic shocks further undermine confidence in the leadership.
